SWiC Logo

Partner Agency of

Schuylkill United Way

Legislation Information

SB 500 (Vulakovich-R) provides law enforcement accompaniment to a victim to their residence before or during the serving of a PFA. SUPPORT THIS BILL BY CONTACTING YOUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE.


SB 501 (Killion-R) would include three parts: (1) requires that a defendant relinquish all firearms, other weapons and ammunition upon entry of a final Protection From Abuse order; (2) eliminates the third party safe-keeping provision for firearms currently described in Pennsylvania’s PFA Act; and (3) requires that a defendant convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence turn in their firearms to law enforcement within 24 hours of their conviction. SUPPORT THIS BILL BY CONTACTING YOUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE.


SB 502 (McGarrigle-R) allows judges the ability to extend the terms of a Protection From Abuse order or create an entirely new one if the order is set to expire or has expired while the defendant is incarcerated. The plaintiff would not be required to show that the defendant engaged in a new act of domestic violence that indicates a continued risk of harm to the plaintiff. SUPPORT THIS BILL BY CONTACTING YOUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE.


SB 6 (Regan-R) prohibits any individual with a drug conviction on their record the ability to receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits for a period of up to 10 years. OPPOSE THIS BILL BY CONTACTING YOUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE.


SB 919 (Haywood-D, co-sponsored by Bartolotta-R and Schwank-D) allows a resident of a county housing authority to request relocation if they or someone affiliated with them has experienced domestic or sexual violence. The resident must certify their status as a victim of domestic violence. SUPPORT THIS BILL BY CONTACTING YOUR LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE.

PA Passes Bill Allowing Use of Risk Assessment Tool in Domestic Violence Cases

In August 2016, an ongoing domestic violence situation in Senator Camera Bartolotta’s senatorial district ended tragically following the armed kidnapping and subsequent murder of Tierne Ewing, a local woman, by her estranged husband. In July 2016, prior to the incident that resulted in her murder, the estranged husband had been arrested for domestic violence and other offenses. Despite a prosecutor’s request to raise or revoke bail due to the husband’s history of abuse and the existence of an active protection from abuse order (PFA), the individual’s bail was not increased. The courts did, however, require that he be confined to his home and monitored with an electronic device on his ankle while awaiting trial for the July arrest. Unfortunately, it was during this time that he removed the ankle monitor and then kidnapped and murdered Tierne Ewing.

This tragedy gained national media attention and prompted the Commonwealth’s district attorneys, domestic violence experts and others to examine how our judicial system can better protect victims of domestic violence. These experts believe removing ambiguity in current law so that judges know they can utilize risk assessment tools is a good first step in helping to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.

Risk assessment tools help meet the goal of enhanced safety for an increasing number of victims, service providers and interveners who are inevitably involved in attempting to identify the most dangerous offenders and manage the risks posed to victims. These tools have been used to assess both an offender’s risk of re-offending and a victim’s risk of lethal assault. They have been proven to be predictive tools of subsequent offenses and current state law contains ambiguous language that has, to date, undermined their use.

In April 2018 PA passed legislation to clarify that Magisterial District Judges may, in cases of domestic violence, use a risk assessment tool to determine whether a defendant poses a danger to a victim when determining bail.


PA Passes Bill Criminalizing Intimate Partner Sexual Harassment on Internet

In July 2014, Pennsylvania joined a dozen other states in enacting legislation that made intimate partner sexual harassment a crime.

Intimate partner harassment is a term often referring to the posting of nude or sexually explicit photographs or videos of people online without their consent, even if the photograph itself was taken with consent. A current or former spouse, girlfriend, or boyfriend may get revenge or seek to regain control of a victim by uploading photographs to websites, many of which are set up specifically for these kinds of photos or videos. The victim’s name, address, and links to social media profiles are often included with the images, and some websites charge a fee to have the materials removed.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Thomas Murt (R-Montgomery County), defines this crime as exposing a photograph, film, videotape, or similar recording of the identifiable image of an intimate partner who is nude or explicitly engaged in a sexual act to the view of a third party for no legitimate purpose and with the intent to harass, annoy, or alarm the person depicted. In Pennsylvania, this crime is a felony for depicting a minor and misdemeanor for a non-minor. The bill also grants victims the right to seek damages in civil courts.


PA Bill Protects Domestic Violence Victims from Eviction

In October 2014, Pennsylvania legislators passed a bill ensuring that victims of domestic violence are not evicted from their residences for calling emergency services multiple times.

The bill negates a controversial provision contained in “nuisance ordinances’’ enforced in dozens of Pennsylvania communities, requiring landlords to evict tenants from residences where 9-1-1 has been called several times in a brief period, usually three times in 12 months.

Rep. Todd Stephens (R-Montgomery County) sponsored the bill in reaction to a case in Norristown, PA. A woman – who was assaulted by an ex-partner who had repeatedly broken into her residence – nearly bled to death because she feared eviction if she called 9-1-1 again. She survived after a neighbor called for assistance. Stephens’ bill passed unanimously in the House in March, but it had stalled in the Senate because of attempts by senators to attach unrelated amendments. Senators finally voted to consider only Stephens’ bill.